Micronations.net Forum Archive
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 12, 2010, 04:38 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
64,668 Posts in 5,990 Topics by 440 Members
Latest Member: Chancellor Zane
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Micronations.net Forum Archive
|-+  Archives
| |-+  Conference Archives
| | |-+  Economic Summit 2002 Archives
| | | |-+  Discussion about Automating an Economic System
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Discussion about Automating an Economic System  (Read 929 times)
Trevon Andarosel
Guest
« Reply #30 on: May 24, 2002, 02:02 AM »

It took my a while to figure it out myself :) .



I think he means to keep track of all economic transactions (money, goods, resources) of a country in one bank, combine these data to statistics of how well the country is doing (in an ecomonic view) and base the value of the currency on these statistics.



Trevon.

The storyteller of Ex, Umbagollah


Ilotim ilo arelisin il parduvile arelis te arelisin
The truth is just too true to be true for everyone

Logged
Sander042802
Fan
*
Posts: 570


« Reply #31 on: May 24, 2002, 02:57 AM »

Could you repeat that in Dutch please :lol



no it seems to be a good idea. But then we need a standard to calculate these statistics..





Sander Dieleman

Chancellor of the

Micronation of Pacary

http://www.pacary.tk/

http://www.pacaryforums.tk/

VP of Operations of Bobbesian Airways



Quan nos esteramos reunis, le munde esteras complete de nove - me

Aaaaaaahhh... the power of knowledge. - me again

yup yup - Commander Clark

Logged
Ken Avonts
Fan
*
Posts: 97


WWW
« Reply #32 on: May 24, 2002, 03:14 AM »

I don't think this is such a good idea. I don't like this kind of virtual inflations. Why not use the idea already discussed (I cannot find it back): every nation gets 1000 inter-micronational currency. Each nation can print as much money as they want. Every national currency will be easy to convert to another one.



e.g. Nation A prints 2000 units; so 1 inter-unit = 2 A-units. Nation B prints 3000 units, and later they print 2000 more; so 1 inter-unit = 5 B-units.



This means that 1 A-unit = 2.5 B-units.



Is this not the most simple and workable system? All this formulas make me sick :-(

Ken Avonts

Regent of the Islamic Republic of
Antverpia


http://users.pandora.be/ir-antverpia

Logged
Zhaki the Dolphin
Guest
« Reply #33 on: May 24, 2002, 07:01 AM »

Umm... why couldn't we just throw ALL those formulae away and use a very simple, capitalistic system? Like this:



A says to B: "I have 100 tymarks and I want to exchange them to 100 rials of yours."

B: "That won't happen. I'll be happy with 150 tymarks, though."

A: "What about 200 tymarks for 150 rials?"

B: "Fine with me."

 * A and B do an exchange of currency *



There could, of course, be directive currency exchange values, but since they would only be directive, we wouldn't really need to care about making them over-accurate and complicated. They could even be just the medium of the latest exchange rates between currencies.



The real value of this system would be that we could make all these complicated formulae work in "encapsulated", separate organizations. Let's assume, now, that the ICEO will come back some day. It would take part in the giant "roof" economic system as a single organisation; everybody would be able to choose whether to exchange currencies through the ICEO or through private investors. That way there'd be more possibilities for competition, too - everyone could start their own currency exchange company.



* Ari wishes he could figure out all this SQL stuff so that he could finally actually start the programming of the GIBS *

Logged
Sander042802
Fan
*
Posts: 570


« Reply #34 on: May 24, 2002, 07:39 PM »

hmm.. true....  both methods seem cool. I dunno I ain't no economist.





Sander Dieleman

Chancellor of the

Micronation of Pacary

http://www.pacary.tk/

http://www.pacaryforums.tk/

VP of Operations of Bobbesian Airways



Quan nos esteramos reunis, le munde esteras complete de nove - me

Aaaaaaahhh... the power of knowledge. - me again

yup yup - Commander Clark

Logged
Brendig45
Guest
« Reply #35 on: May 25, 2002, 12:34 AM »

Yeah, although with the first method, it means that you have to go to the trouble of finding someone who owns the currency you want, then convincing them that they should sell them...



An easier method is through your second method, with currency exchange companies.. it means there is more money to work with and exchange.

Jeffrey Leong


Vizier of The Ministry of Trade and
Economics


Satrap of Kelestan

Sartip of the Imperial Babkhan Army

Ambassador to the LoSS


Kingdom of Babkha

Logged
William Howard
Guest
« Reply #36 on: May 25, 2002, 02:51 AM »

While the first provides stable and easy exchange rates, the second method is just as attractive.



In our economy for example there is no set amount of currency, mainly due to the fictional element. That means we could easily integrate with the second but might find it impossible to use the first without totally changing our system.

William Howard

Chairman

Republic of Baracão

"We have no alternative. We must continue dreaming, with the hope that the better world will become a reality -- as it will, if we keep struggling. Humanity should never renounce its dreams, its utopias. Struggling for utopia means, in part, building it"

Logged
Sir Iain de Vembria
Fan
*
Posts: 406


WWW
« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2002, 11:58 PM »

If one could create for self-contained system that doesn't rely on external data, it would allow for an exchange standard of any degree of complexity. Don't forget that the whole point of an automated system is to take care of all the formulae so you don't have to worry about them.

Sir Iain
Knight-Councillor of The Barony of Treesia & Fabon,

Discuss micronations and read the news at the Micronational News Network

Logged

"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
Zhaki the Dolphin
Guest
« Reply #38 on: May 28, 2002, 06:32 AM »

* tries his best to figure out STL (how pathetic) *



(I don't know whether C++ syntax is hirsute or elegant, but I'll probably need to learn to think outside the box to understand what's going on in www.infosys.tuwien.ac.at/.../prw22.htm ... and this isn't yet even STL...)

Logged
Trevon Andarosel
Guest
« Reply #39 on: May 28, 2002, 08:04 PM »

You're right. This can't be understood by reasonable men (or women), so you have to stop being reasonable. My c++ knowledge is a bit rusty, but I think they have defined a function type. If you make a declaration like

int a;, you have an integer variable named a. If you say (from the example)

less less_than_five(5);

you have a functioned of type less named less_than_five. In my opinion, this looks like very dirty programming, but my programming standards might be a bit oldfashioned... (I have never liked overloading of operators in C++, and pointers in C either).



Trevon

The storyteller of Ex, Umbagollah


Ilotim ilo arelisin il parduvile arelis te arelisin
The truth is just too true to be true for everyone

Logged
Zhaki the Dolphin
Guest
« Reply #40 on: May 28, 2002, 10:01 PM »

I think I've understood it now... Somewhat... It's still very weird, though.



Hmm. Nice tutorial. In part 4.1 I'm given exercises where iterators are used, in 4.2 iterators are explained :rolleyes :...

Logged
Zhaki the Dolphin
Guest
« Reply #41 on: June 09, 2002, 01:08 AM »

As a situation report... I've now read through an STL tutorial, the SQL manual and the MySQL++ API manual, so I know, in theory, pretty much all I need for SQL database integration into C++. JWCGI seems useful enough to be used as the CGI library (I've already tried MizCGI, cgipp and VBMcgi, and none of them fitted my needs). I've also set up a development box with Apache and a MySQL server at my summer workplace, so I'll be able to code and test stuff quickly on weekdays. On weekends I won't have access to development software.



Except an initial version Real Soon Now.  

Logged
Trevon Andarosel
Guest
« Reply #42 on: June 11, 2002, 06:22 AM »

Why so difficult? Can't you use CGI to get your data, PHP or PERL to process it, and SQL to put stuff in databases (or get it out of it, don't know what SQL actually does, infact).



Trevon.

The storyteller of Ex, Umbagollah


Ilotim ilo arelisin il parduvile arelis te arelisin
The truth is just too true to be true for everyone

Logged
Sander042802
Fan
*
Posts: 570


« Reply #43 on: June 11, 2002, 08:02 PM »

i've been installing a lot of BB's lately so i know more or less what SQL and PHP do. It would be perfectly possible I think... And really cool :D  


Sander Dieleman



Chancellor of the Micronation of Pacary



VP of Operations of Bobbesian Airways



HPi of Pi



Colonel of the PM


Die hard Pokey the penguin fan



ICQ#104572163 - MSN sanderdieleman@hotmail.com - AIM SanderDieleman


Logged
Zhaki the Dolphin
Guest
« Reply #44 on: June 11, 2002, 09:10 PM »

Trevon, you're a blockhead :p . My intention is (or at least was) this: I'd build a C++ application that would use the JWCGI library for decoding form data, setting cookies, maybe writing some HTML, etc, and MySQL++ for interfacing with the SQL server. Pretty much every web application that uses SQL works in this way - the languages and libraries used might change (if you're writing your application in PERL you will most probably use cgi.pm and the PERL DBI, if you used C you would use cgic and perhaps the libwww SQL API) but the basic idea's the same. You're essentially asking me to change the language I'll write the program in... Which might well happen, since I read a PHP manual last night and immediately fell in love in the straightforward session management.



Right now I'm trying to make the SQL API of PHP actually work by compiling PHP with my own options... with a 200 MHz / 32 MB machine :rolleyes :...

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!