last topic from kingdom of Lutherania

[KingMichaelI]

we the kingdom of lutherania joined microwiki and micronations.net to promote our kingdom and to talk with other like minded people. all we have found is that most nations are cyber were as we exsist as a real functioning body with actual territorial claims and another thing we don't appreciate is that 1 person controls ...well trys to control everything we are a indpendent governing body if we wanna be told what to do we will stay in the United Kingdom. So we are leaving all these "cyber" nations and seeking people with real political ambitions, and were we are not harrased by a "overlord" who thinks he can do what he wants when he wants and to who he wants. NO i think not we would rather be a governing body of our own AND if we wanted to be told what to do we would listen to gorden brown NO we ARE lutherania and NO ONE will tell us how to run OUR nation and how we can an can not have a encyclopedia entry which last time i checked was for PUBLIC use to use AS ONE WANTED.

farewell
Kingdom of Lutherania

P.S we do not care about spellings or Grammar we have more important things to do as a nations including celebrating our second independence day today .

[Guido Zambelis]

That's right, you really have control over your own land. If you kill someone, the police will just leave you alone because you 'ARE lutherania' and you don't listen to nasty Mr. Brown.

It's like talking to five year olds.

*starts flame war of the year*

[Liam Sinclair]

how we can an can not have a encyclopedia entry which last time i checked was for PUBLIC use to use AS ONE WANTED.

Hmm, are you crying over your Micronations.net Wiki article being marked for deletion because it contravenes the orphaned article policy? If so, there's a reason why you've been given 14 days to do the simple task of enabling one link to your article in another Wiki article to remove the orphaned status and thus remove the article from the deletion list (one method is enabling a link from the currencies article, for example).

You're certainly getting all worked up over what is a two-second fix to bring your article into compliance with Wiki policies that are designed to ensure that people can access and read your article. As it stands right now, unless a person randomly comes across your article on the Wiki or has the direct URL in hand, there's no way for people to navigate to it.

If we didn't value your article, you wouldn't have been given 14 days to make the minor change that will provide your micronation with wider exposure to those who visit the Wiki to learn about existing micronations.

If you lack the technical capacity to carry out the minor fix, all you had to do was file a request on one of the Sysop talk pages to get assistance. We have no problem helping you out if you aren't familiar with the Wiki code enough to make the changes yourself; however, you can't expect the Sysops to be responsible for fixing 100+ articles on the orphaned list. This is why the onus is placed on the article creator (or another interested party) through the article being marked for deletion. It ensures timely response to addressing the deficiency, at the least. It's nothing personal, so please don't take it as such.

P.S. The Micronations.net Wiki, like Wikipedia, is for use by anyone, so long as they use it within the policies established to ensure a functional Wiki in which all articles are encyclopaedic and internally linked, among others.

[Liam Sinclair]

This matter has been resolved. Topic moved to the Micronations.net Wiki forum for archiving.